#vacuuming insights

[howdoesone]

How does one reflect on the nature of dust while vacuuming the living room?

In the humdrum of household chores, there are moments of unexpected profundity waiting to be discovered. Vacuuming the living room, a task often relegated to the realm of mundane routine, presents one with a unique opportunity to reflect on the nature of dust and its metaphorical implications. This article explores how one can contemplate existential questions while engaged in the act of…

[nickyandmikey]

i've had such a productive day and it's not even over yet. it feels great but watch me not do anything for the next two weeks

[creativeera]

The Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market is Embracing Cordless Designs

Global canister vacuum cleaner market is estimated to be valued at USD 3.46 Bn in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 6.58 Bn by 2031, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6% from 2024 to 2031.

Canister vacuum cleaners are free-standing vacuum cleaners that consist of a canister that houses the motor, fan, and dirt collection bag or container and attached to a long rigid or flexible hose with wand and attachments. Canister vacuum cleaners are known for their powerful sucking capacity, lightweight handling, and suitability for cleaning all types of floors including carpets and hardwood floors. They provide deep cleaning and are capable of picking pet hair, dust, debris, and allergens effectively. The Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market is driven by growing consumer demand for multipurpose, easy to use, and high-performance cleaning appliances. Key Takeaways Key players operating in the Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market are Kärcher North America, Inalsa, Delfinvacuums, Miele, Shark, Samsung, Dyson, Electrolux , LG Electronics, Hoover, Kenmore, Eureka, BISSELL, Panasonic, Hitachi, Makita, AEG, and Nilfisk. The growing demand for versatile, easy to use, and highly effective cleaning appliances from households and commercial sectors is fueling the growth of the Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market. People are adopting canister vacuum cleaners for their powerful suction, light weight, and suitability for various floor types. Rapid urbanization and rising health awareness are further complementing the market growth. The key players in the Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market are focusing on expanding their product portfolio and global footprint through mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, and distribution agreements. Manufacturers are strengthening their presence in developing regions of Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Latin America experiencing high urbanization and growth in disposable income. This is anticipated to create new revenue streams for players over the forecast period. Market Key Trends One of the key trends gaining traction in the Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market Size is the rising popularity of cordless designs. Manufacturers are focusing on developing lightweight, portable, and convenient to use cordless vacuum cleaners that provide comparable suction power to corded models. Cordless vacuum cleaners are gaining widespread acceptance owing to their easy maneuverability and freedom from cord tangling issues. The increasing advances in lithium-ion battery technology allowing longer runtimes per charge are propelling the demand for cordless vacuum cleaners globally. This trend is expected to continue and transform the canister vacuum cleaner market landscape over the coming years.

Porter’s Analysis Threat of new entrants: The threat of new entrants in the global canister vacuum cleaner market is low due to the presence of well-established brands and high initial costs involved in setting up production and marketing facilities. Bargaining power of buyers: The bargaining power of buyers in the global canister vacuum cleaner market is high due to the availability of multiple brands and product options at different price points. Bargaining power of suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers in the global canister vacuum cleaner market is moderate due to the availability of raw material providers. Threat of new substitutes: The threat of new substitutes in the global canister vacuum cleaner market is low as canister vacuum cleaners have strong brand recognition and customer loyalty. Competitive rivalry: The competitive rivalry in the global canister vacuum cleaner market is high due to the large number of key players operating at regional and global levels. North America and Europe represent the largest geographical markets for global canister vacuum cleaner market in terms of value. Presence of developed economies, high disposable income, and increased awareness about smart and innovative home appliances are some of the factors driving the demand for canister vacuum cleaners in these regions. The fastest growing region for the global canister vacuum cleaner market is Asia Pacific. Factors such as rapid industrialization, growing middle class population, rising living standards, and increased spending on homecare products are expected to fuel the adoption of canister vacuum cleaners in Asia Pacific region over the forecast period.

Get more insights on Global Canister Vacuum Cleaner Market

About Author:

Money Singh is a seasoned content writer with over four years of experience in the market research sector. Her expertise spans various industries, including food and beverages, biotechnology, chemical and materials, defense and aerospace, consumer goods, etc. (https://www.linkedin.com/in/money-singh-590844163)

[cmibloggers]

The global hyperloop technology market has garnered significant attention in recent years, promising a revolution in transportation. Read More: https://cmi-reports.blogspot.com/2023/06/exploring-global-hyperloop-technology.html

[electronalytics]

Vacuum Sensors Market Analysis, Trends and Dynamic Demand by Forecast 2017 to 2032

The vacuum sensors market refers to the industry that produces and sells sensors designed to measure vacuum levels in a variety of applications. These sensors are used in various industries such as semiconductor manufacturing, chemical processing, pharmaceuticals, and aerospace, among others. Vacuum sensors are essential in controlling vacuum levels, and they play a vital role in ensuring the quality, reliability, and safety of various manufacturing processes.

The vacuum sensors market is driven by the increasing demand for vacuum sensors in various applications. The semiconductor industry, in particular, is a major market for vacuum sensors, as these sensors are used to monitor vacuum levels during the production of microchips and other semiconductor devices. Additionally, the growth of the aerospace industry and the need for more precise vacuum monitoring in space applications is expected to drive the demand for vacuum sensors in the coming years.

According to a report published by Stringent datalytics, the global vacuum sensors market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 6.4% during the forecast period of 2021-2027. The market was valued at approximately USD 1.3 billion in 2020 and is expected to reach a value of USD 1.9 billion by the end of the forecast period.

The report states that the vacuum sensors market is being driven by various factors, including the increasing demand for vacuum sensors in various applications, such as semiconductor manufacturing, chemical processing, and aerospace. The report highlights that vacuum sensors play a vital role in ensuring the quality, reliability, and safety of various manufacturing processes.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: https://stringentdatalytics.com/sample-request/vacuum-sensors-market/646/

Market Segmentations: Global Vacuum Sensors Market: By Company • Thyracont Vacuum • Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum • InstruTech • Vuototecnica • INFICON • Budenberg • Yonsha • NXP Semiconductors Global Vacuum Sensors Market: By Type • Temperature Sensor • Pressure Sensor • Flow Sensor • Others Global Vacuum Sensors Market: By Application • Transportation • Architecture • Petroleum • Chemical • Others Global Vacuum Sensors Market: Regional Analysis All the regional segmentation has been studied based on recent and future trends, and the market is forecasted throughout the prediction period. The countries covered in the regional analysis of the Global Vacuum Sensors market report are U.S., Canada, and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, and Rest of Europe in Europe, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Argentina, Brazil, and Rest of South America as part of South America.

Visit Report Page for More Details :  https://stringentdatalytics.com/reports/vacuum-sensors-market/646/

Reasons to Purchase Vacuum Sensors Market Report: • To gain insights into market trends and dynamics: this reports provide valuable insights into industry trends and dynamics, including market size, growth rates, and key drivers and challenges. • To identify key players and competitors: this research reports can help businesses identify key players and competitors in their industry, including their market share, strategies, and strengths and weaknesses. • To understand consumer behavior: this research reports can provide valuable insights into consumer behavior, including their preferences, purchasing habits, and demographics. • To evaluate market opportunities: this research reports can help businesses evaluate market opportunities, including potential new products or services, new markets, and emerging trends. • To make informed business decisions: this research reports provide businesses with data-driven insights that can help them make informed business decisions, including strategic planning, product development, and marketing and advertising strategies. Overall, market research reports provide businesses and organizations with valuable information that can help them make informed decisions and stay competitive in their industry. They can provide a solid foundation for business planning, strategy development, and decision-making.

Buy Now this Premium Report to Grow your Business : https://stringentdatalytics.com/purchase/vacuum-sensors-market/646/?license=single

About US:

Stringent Datalytics offers both custom and syndicated market research reports. Custom market research reports are tailored to a specific client's needs and requirements. These reports provide unique insights into a particular industry or market segment and can help businesses make informed decisions about their strategies and operations.

Syndicated market research reports, on the other hand, are pre-existing reports that are available for purchase by multiple clients. These reports are often produced on a regular basis, such as annually or quarterly, and cover a broad range of industries and market segments. Syndicated reports provide clients with insights into industry trends, market sizes, and competitive landscapes. By offering both custom and syndicated reports, Stringent Datalytics can provide clients with a range of market research solutions that can be customized to their specific needs.

Contact US:

Stringent Datalytics

Contact No - 91-9763384149

Email Id -  sales@stringentdatalytics.com

Web - https://stringentdatalytics.com/

[bimboficationblues]

so the thing about "read theory" as a mantra: in the social media sphere there is a consistent downplaying of what that kind of commitment actually entails, plus a consistent obfuscation of what exactly the commitment is necessary for.

let's say that you're interested in learning more about specifically "Marxist theory." This, I think, also raises a bunch of questions about what we mean by theory - works of political philosophy, texts on revolutionary and military strategy, political speeches, journalistic or sociological analysis, historiography - these varying things with very different discursive norms and standards of evidence or logic often get rolled into one singular object called "theory." but let's set that aside for now.

you want to learn this for maybe an assortment of reasons, here's a few (non-exhaustive) good ones:

Marxism has been a substantial historical force that has probably had a notable impact on the world around you in some way.

Learning about Marx/ism might offer some level of insight into your current social world that other things are unable to offer.

Many texts - Capital, The Wretched of the Earth, The Second Sex, The State and Revolution - are also world-historical forms of political literature, which is interesting.

Follow-up to 2 - maybe having some level of familiarity with these things will give you the ability to better articulate yourself and participate in social and political movements around you.

generally speaking the Social Media Marxist approach is to tell you to go read off a list of texts of whatever writers the author personally agrees with or whatever works she happens to have read. so you decide to start with the big guy Marx, who is at the top of the list. totally reasonable decision.

however, there are a few contextual questions that might reasonably come up when doing so.

first, it will be clear that Marx did not pop out of an intellectual vacuum; Lenin has a rather popular identification of the "three sources of Marxism" - post-Hegelian German philosophy, French socialism, and English political economy. from my perspective, these are more like three of his main objects of ire (and so in some sense are both influences and also breakages - but not strictly speaking a synthesis), but I digress. so, frequently, in order to grasp what Marx is talking about or responding to, you are going to need some level of familiarity with a lot of additional people: Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, Hegel, Bauer, Feuerbach, Hobbes, Spinoza, Rousseau, Mill, Sismondi. suddenly you are not just learning about the works of one guy, but his attitude towards all the people he relies on for support or aims his criticisms at. and each of those different intellectual relationships is going to be different. sometimes at different times!

second, and relatedly, Marx is not always the most charitable to the people he's criticizing, who were often rival socialists (so there were pretty notable political and personal stakes at work in proving them wrong or diminishing their influence over the movement). the introductory materials to the new translation of Capital also observe that Marx's approach to scholarship is, shall we say, haphazard; often he makes quotes or citations that are not actually representative of what he's citing. finally, many of the people he's criticizing have sort of been rendered obsolete historically *in no small part* due to the success of Marxism as a political orientation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. so to determine whether Marx is being fair to the people he is basing his critique on, we will have to do some level of intellectual work to check. so now we're not just evaluating Marx's relationship to different thinkers but also the substantial content of each of those thinkers themselves.

third, Marx did not pop out of a social vacuum. all of these different writers didn't just crop up from nowhere but wrote within particular sociohistorical contexts, some of which were rather divorced from the European revolutionary wave, first worldwide financial crisis, and the shifting character of the United States in the wake of the Civil War and the formal abolition of slavery - some of the historical events that Marx was more explicitly engaging with. and the radical liberals, republicans, and socialists Marx criticized all also had their own intellectual and social histories. so now we're getting a little far afield from the initial notion, which was just to read some guy, and getting into the realm of social history, and trying to understand the relationship between world history and the ideas produced within it.

fourth, you are a subject in the world, which is to say YOU did not pop out of a social or intellectual vacuum. you likely bring predispositions, assumptions, biases, and cognitive distortions to what you read; we all do. working through those and trying to note where they're happening - where they might be fine and where they might be problematic - will require a certain willingness to reflect, to write, to take notes, to analyze and self-scrutinize, and to be critical of both yourself as a reader and of the text you are reading. (a nested problem is that we have a truly staggering amount of material from Marx and Engels, and you might have to make certain determinations as to which material is important or worthwhile or more useful, and identify the standards by which you think that - all of which requires a certain reflection on your status as a political thinker).

okay, so consider all that. we started with "I wanna read this one guy," we end with "to really grasp the work of this one guy it's also important to know both preceding and contemporaneous world history, his intellectual influences, and the gaps or silences or errors in his work.” now consider that, if you really want to be able to speak on them with some level of confidence and intellectual honesty, you have to apply approximately the same level of rigor to every other writer on the Social Media Marxist approved list - Lenin, Fanon, Che, Kollontai, Cabral, Mao, Luxemburg, whoever. not to mention their critics, both direct and indirect!

Marx developed his work through an incredibly sustained engagement with enormous volumes of different material; we have entire notebooks of him poring over Max Stirner, or Spinoza, or the political economists, or the empirical observations of English factory inspectors. I'm not saying that you have to do that, or even that one strictly *has* to go down any or all of the first three rabbitholes I identified. Marx was in the somewhat unique position of sustaining himself through the support of Engels and his journalistic work, as a product of being in perpetual exile. that's not the kind of position that most of us are typically in.

the point is not "commit yourself to being a perfect monastic scholar in order to reach perfect truth" - such a thing is probably a fantasy, even if we wish otherwise. the point is that if you think "theory" is worth taking seriously, well, you have to actually take it seriously. if you don’t think it has stakes or utility, that’s fine; different people find different things useful. I think “theory” is not a set of dead letters by canonical authors but produced through social life. but if “reading theory” is a way to clarify and assert yourself as a political subject and agent, to claim some intellectual autonomy and acquire some understanding that you can put into practice in your life, then that’s demanding. it’s not impossible, but it does take real effort and a commitment to study and a certain level of resistance to being dogmatic. otherwise you are just letting yourself be rhetorically persuaded by whatever is in front of you or whatever affirms your biases.

as Marx says in the preface to Capital, Volume I, "I am of course assuming that my readers will want to learn something new, and so are ready to think for themselves."

[baphometsss]

I don't wanna sit here and act like I'm a professional or anything, because I'm not, but as someone who has had to do a lot of work to overcome trauma and reconfigure my brain more or less from the ground up, there's a lot I have to say about Solas's mental state

We know that Solas was essentially used and abused by Mythal for millennia. Even if he wasn't under a geas, he was twisted from his purpose by being made to fight, and then created the Wolf's Fang which was used to make the Titans tranquil and started the Blights. He made those choices himself, but it's important to understand that no choice is ever made in a vacuum. She took advantage of his vulnerability when he was given a body after however long as a spirit semi-existing peacefully in the Fade, and moulded him into a weapon.

He is broken, because Mythal broke him. I'm not incapable of seeing why she did what she did because like I said, no one makes choices in a vacuum and I could write about her for a long time too (in a similar way to how I have had to do myself in my own life in understanding why others abused me). He was so traumatised by everything that happened and he was trauma bonded to Mythal pretty much from the minute he gained a body. Trauma bonds are not about love. He definitely interpreted it that way, as most people do, but that's the weapon abusers use to keep the victim under their control. Abuse abuse abuse show a scrap of love and then abuse some more. If I just take it, I'll get the love/attention I need. I will earn it, because love is suffering, and I have to suffer to earn getting my basic needs met from my family/friends. Mythal, as his creator, was the one who he would've attached to in a similar way to spirit Cole/human Cole.

Trauma bonds are pathological. Mythal made him believe that if he did as she asked, and kept supporting her, then eventually he would gain her favour and they would be able to free all the elves, and he'd be able to live according to his true nature, which is one where he doesn't have to fight. (Remember his personal quest in DAI? He actually kills the rebel mages for corrupting his friend--another Wisdom spirit--into Pride.) In reality, she was just using him. She always kept the bone just out of reach for her lapdog. The line from Rook where they say (paraphrasing here) 'you know, I was actually excited about getting your approval... That's how you do it, isn't it? Keep giving little scraps of approval to keep someone loyal, and then you turn around and betray them' is so telling too.

Where--or from whom--do you think he learned to do this?

It literally reeks of a pathological trauma bond and honestly, with how isolated, 'grim and fatalistic' Solas is, it is not a surprise that he's so broken.

Solas, essentially, is little more than a lap-dog to Mythal. He followed her like a lost puppy, because especially in his early days, that's kind of what he was. You have to remember that most of the insight we get about Mythal is from Solas's perspective, and he is not a reliable person when it comes to her after so long being repeatedly terrorised and twisted and manipulated. There are several instances where he describes being betrayed by her, and mentions some of the things she did, but he never quite holds her fully accountable and ends up directing his rage elsewhere. (The parallel between Mythal/Solas and the rebel mages/Wisdom is important here.)

This awesome post by @mythalism only reinforces this. He is so messed up in that scene, he is broken, he is holding the Wolf's Fang up, trying to give it to her because it symbolises the burden he has carried for thousands of years trying to avenge her death. He never wanted the Fang, like he never wanted a body. Mythal just stands over him, fully aware of what she did to him, and only getting him to stop because Rook petitioned her successfully, and the reunion with the more benevolent Mythal within Morrigan tempered her anger. She was a goddess, with the unequal power dynamic, right to the end.

As a side note, on the potential romance element between Mythal and Solas, I read an excellent breakdown of it on Reddit a while ago about how out of character it would've been for Solas to keep something like that from a romanced Lavellan, especially in Trespasser when he comes clean about his plan/past. I can't find it now because it was pre-Veilguard release, but it made a lot of sense to me. Solas and Lavellan never have a love scene in DAI because Solas didn't want to 'lay with them under false pretences'. Lying about who you are when sleeping with someone is nonconsensual. You can't consent to sleeping with someone if you don't know their true identity, and someone who knowingly lies about who they are to get into your pants is a sexual predator. For someone who led a slave rebellion (no doubt many of them being sex slaves), and a former spirit of Wisdom, Solas would've been well aware of this. In the unsent letter from Solas to Lavellan he says he came so close to breaking and desperately wanted to stay with them as Solas, with the implication being that that is where he planned to sleep with them once he'd come clean. But because he stops, because he's still unable to forgive himself or release himself from his trauma bond with Mythal, he breaks away, and they never have sex.

Bottom line: Solas would've been honest about it. Especially that. As the Inquisitor says, he can't lie about his heart.

And it's why the Solas/Lavellan romance is so powerful because quote, 'you change everything'. Solas thought he knew what love was, that love was loyalty, devotion, worship, etc. It's not just his plans or worldview that Lavellan changes. Lavellan sees him for who he is, without the mantle of Dread Wolf, and because of that he's able to express his true nature to her, even if he's not being totally honest in Inquisition. Lavellan got much closer to the real him than most, as he says, and changed his understanding of love completely. Unfortunately, he has unfinished business, an unresolved trauma bond, and his crushing sense of duty to the past is what keeps him from taking that final step towards letting go of it entirely. Trick also says Solas doesn't think he deserves love, which tbh is kind of a hallmark trait of people who have survived abuse.

And honestly? Call me a simp but I think he really was trying to get the Inquisitor to stop him. He saw himself being unable to let go because he was so broken and burdened by his guilt, and knew he couldn't save himself--was too proud to admit that he couldn't, because how pathetic does it make him look? And how could he stop now without rendering all the damage he'd wrought pointless? Yet here was someone who had changed him right down to his core, who understood him in a way few people ever had, whom he trusted, whom he loved in a way he hadn't loved anyone else before. It took him 'centuries' to build up rapport with the members of his rebellion. The man does not know how to form attachments without trauma, and suddenly he forms a strong one with someone who loves him completely and without condition. It's a jarring change.

Lavellan says that maybe they're being prideful themselves, refusing to see their own folly. But I think in admitting that they might be wrong, that it might be wishful thinking borne from misguided love to a truly terrible person, they've rendered the point moot. It shows self-awareness, which isn't folly.

If anyone can make Solas understand true love, it's Lavellan. Lavellan loved him when he was being his true self. Lavellan loved him after his betrayal was revealed. Lavellan loved him when his guilty conscience and terrible actions almost destroyed the world. Lavellan loved him because they knew the real him, and knew that his heart and spirit were broken, and knew that their love would endure, that their love would heal him.

And that's exactly where they end up. Healing the past, soothing the Blight, and loving one another completely.

[theic-manic]

Your Polytheist reminder that if you have altars in your home, then ...

Your housework is tending your temple.

Vacuuming, cleaning up the clutter, dusting... all of it.

Housework suddenly becomes not only easier but spiritually fulfilling when I play music and envision that I am not cleaning my bedroom or apartment but in fact cleaning my modern day temple.

You can dedicate cleaning each room or each corner to a specific deity if you like in addition to your altars.

Cleaning itself is not only great active meditation (it's when I get my best deity insights, such as this very post) but is such an underrated act of worship and devotion.

Witchy tip: sweeping dust etc out the door is a super effective cleansing activity that doesn't require expensive herbs or other ingredients.

Go forth and clean thy temples, babes. 😘🕯🧹

[epiphainie]

buck moping over tommy was so cute and i'll cherish that episode in a vacuum regardless of which direction the show goes but i really want/need to hear what buck took from that last conversation. what did he hear? that tommy was scared that he was falling in love with him? that tommy thinks buck doesn't know his own feelings and/or doesn't trust him enough to know his feelings? that tommy thinks buck is not queer enough/in the right way? that tommy always thought this relationship would end or that buck himself jumped too ahead and freaked him out and they can scale back?

because to me that bit of insight into buck will be what informs how the show frames this breakup, subsequently tommy's character, and what buck would want to do/will do/should be doing. maybe i'm thinking deeper than the writing on this show requires again but i can't help be irritated by the missing element in buck's reaction to the breakup. what does he even wanna say if he reaches out to tommy, what would a post-breakup conversation initiated by him even look like? isn't he a wholly-realized character whose insight beyond missing my ex is something the narrative should be touching on?

like we had more insight into what buck thought tommy and his respective roles were in the first "tommy dumped me" episode aka about their first date and yeah because so much of it was heavily connected to buck coming out to maddie and eddie but god can i have a crumb of insight from the main character who had his most transformative relationship end abruptly like that? some sort of reflection on the relationship and the breakup and literally what this character is taking from this story beat for the next step of his character arc? or is that something we move past like everything else and assume has no staying influence on the story/character?

[copperbadge]

I didn't have a specific cleaning plan for today and that resulted in not getting much done but I'm kind of okay with that. Mum sent the cats a new scratching post so I unboxed that and assembled it, and I moved some stuff around a little, but it's evident I was tired today. I chose to rest and reserve energy for therapy. Just as well, I had a LOT to share and Therapist was shocked and delighted about the dating I've been doing. I have a new and keen insight into how Gerald's therapist reacted when he texted about starting a relationship with Alanna.

I'm hosting a get together on Friday so starting to prioritize cleaning for that: making sure the hallway is clear, clearing clutter out of the living room, seeing that the bathroom is presentable. It's funny, I've been talking with Breakfast Date about a second in-person date and I love my condo but I know it comes across a little weird, so I'm reluctant to have them visit. It's not creepy or anything, it's just very personal to me, I decorated it without reference to anyone else's thoughts and sometimes people visiting for the first time get a perplexed expression on entry.

In any case, it was good to rest today. Tomorrow I'll clean the bathroom floor, and maybe vacuum everywhere so I can shampoo the rugs on Wednesday. Slow and steady.

[bonefall]

going to the star spoilers thread and seeing that icestar make owlnose of all cats deputy was certainly ..... something. who's the leading candidate for bb icestar's deputy?

This is actually going to depend a lot based on how I overhaul the politics of RiverClan. It is getting a MASSIVE shakeup, because BB!ASC is going to explore power vacuums.

Canon!RiverClan is full of "nobody" warriors who haven't been characterized, both because we've spent very little time with them historically AND because the writers made the choice to spend barely any time with them in this arc too. This is an issue.

Instead of how canon made it so that RiverClan couldn't find a leader so they all forgot how to do the chores they did their whole lives, THIS time, I'm going to show a bunch of highly qualified warriors breaking up into cliques and descending into in-fighting.

To do this, I have two objectives;

Revamp my RiverClan Family Tree a bit to base a finalized allegiance list on... plus pad it out some more so I can handle the mass exodus that will be happening at the end of the arc.

Characterize extra competitors for RiverClan's leadership, mostly from scratch, along with their key supporters.

Splashtail will be ending up on top through a mixture of imitating Curlfeather and utter luck. My plan is to portray him as someone others might think is manipulative and charismatic, when in reality, he's coasting off the waves of someone who had victory within reach and gave it all up to save her daughter.

(and tigerHeartstar's occupation will be the turning point, as Splashtail unites RiverClan against their common enemy to put himself in power. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT)

I also want to make ASC's attempted theme of "connecting to the past" more meaningful by drawing parallels to this and the Collapse of the River Kingdom.

In fact (been waiting a while to share THIS little idea!) I'm heavily considering that BB!ASC is the end of RiverClan as we know it, and from here on, it's the RiverClan Republic. Give it a slightly different ruling system and allow its culture to change significantly, like how I approach BB!SkyClan.

So... the short answer is that I don't have the pieces for the proper list of "candidates" yet, because a LOT more cats are gonna become eligable.

The parallel short answer is that if I had to pick NOW, it would be Minnowtail, who is going to be receiving her boyfriend Mousewhisker early in this arc and has a very long history with Icewing as an ex-DF trainee. Curious, bold, and insightful, she's someone they can trust as an organized deputy.

(Mousewhisker running across the border rom-com style because he's decided that the time is now to finally be with his secret lover of many years, only to arrive just after a major battle like "oh... is this a bad time?")

[greengirllover]

some insight on school shootings for people who might not be familiar (not trying to be political just want to show that this doesn’t exist in a vacuum and that it’s very real and common) i went to public schools all my life and in these schools the school shooting training was always mandatory and intensive

lockdown is called over the intercom or via emails sent to teachers, hard lock down=intruder, this can mean someone who is not supposed to be there is inside the school or that there is an active shooter, they likely won’t specify it over the intercom and will expect us to treat each hard lockdown as an active shooter threat, we train for this at least yearly and so we follow our training, we shut and lock all doors, shut blinds, barricade doors, hide in a corner (corner will be specified with a sticker that is placed preemptively in all rooms in the corner that is farthest away from any windows or doors) in middle and elementary schools the kids might be given candy as it’s kept by the teachers in these classrooms as a way to keep the children quiet while they hide, nobody comes in or out of any room until it is verified by the police that the shooter has been apprehended and it is safe to come out, we can’t open doors for any students trying to get in or even the cops until it’s verified that it’s actually the police speaking, we are taught to be suspicious of anyone and everyone including police and intercom announcements as the shooter can manipulate this, if you aren’t in a classroom when a lockdown is called you need to hide yourself in a bathroom stall, they teach us how to make our breathing quiet and to stand on the toilet so our feet are hidden, some schools have buckets and toilet paper along with a first aid kit in that same designated corner in case we are in lockdown for long enough that someone needs to use the bathroom, we are taught that if we see a gun on the ground not to touch it or be near it as the cops will shoot us on site if they see anyone near a gun, we are taught to cover the gun with something ideally a trash can flipped over on top of the gun, once it’s verified that the police have cleared the building we need to keep our hands up at all times when exiting the building with the police and are expected to remain calm and in a straight line without talking, we are taught how to play dead, we are taught to lay dead bodies over ourselves so that the shooter will think we are already dead and move on to another person or room, we are taught to expect to be left on the ground without medical attention if we are shot until the police have apprehended the subject, we are taught not to expect to be allowed to use our phones to text family members because most teachers won’t allow it due to notifications or lights being a possible give away to your hidden location, we are also given locations near the school where we can hide out if we found a way out before the shooter was apprehended

[whenmemorydies]

Violence and Love in Monkey Man

Dev Patel's Monkey Man has played at my mind for two weeks now. This is for reasons that I'm able to articulate and for many that I probably have not yet been able to find the words for. This post is, in part, my attempt at sorting through some of my thoughts. My tumblr is all spoilers all the time. If you don’t want that, then please don’t read on.

Violence

Like most places in the world, systemic violence is a scourge in India. Monkey Man does not shy away from this reality and depicts Hindu nationalist state violence and violence against women and gendered minorities in the country to chilling effect.

We come to see this in the brutal rape and murder of Kid's activist mother at the hands of the police, while she tries to shield her child and her land from police and state terror. We see it in the treatment of (largely femme-presenting) sex workers in the two brothels featured in the film, including one frequented by the police and political elite. We see it in the violence and ostracisation meted out against the hijra, or third gender community by individual actors and the state more broadly. We see it in the state-orchestrated razing of an entire community after the land on which it sits is declared a "holy site". We see it in the movement of people from the regions to the city after their land has been stolen and the grinding poverty they face as a result.

Unlike so many action films, none of the violence in Monkey Man occurs in a vacuum. Even Kid's original means of making money in an underground fighting ring is done against the backdrop of his forced displacement from regional India to the city - a migration pathway that many in the country have been forced to take and which is a direct result of land theft and resource extraction in the regions by local and multinational corporations as well as federal and state governments.

The truth is that so much in relation to state and societal control is enacted in painful and violent ways on the bodies of the marginalised and oppressed. And I often think about how the horror and action genres are some of the best suited to speak about systemic injustice because of their capacity to make that violence uncompromisingly visible (one recent example is Mike Flanagan’s Midnight Mass which depicted the bloody fallout of the Christian missionary/colonial project in vivid crimson, splashed all over a non-descript maritime town in present-day America). The violence in Monkey Man is no different.

While Kid's realisation of the interconnectedness and heavy hand of the state not just in the violence experienced by his mother, but also by the hijra, and by sex workers like Sita comes later in the movie, we as the audience are given this insight earlier. Recall Kid pointing out to Sita that her tattoo is of a koel, not a sparrow as originally misidentified by the Australian client sexually assaulting her minutes earlier in the film.

Kid goes on to say that he grew up in the forest and woke up to koels singing everyday. Its the longest conversation that the two have but in those brief words, we understand that Sita too has likely been displaced to the city from the regions, probably under very similar circumstances to Kid. The way this displacement maps itself onto her body is distinctive to how it does so for Kid, with gender playing a large role in this.

Other factors like caste, class and religion also impact on how the characters in this film experience or perpetrate violence. I would write more on these intersections but then this post is going to get more unwieldy than it already is.

I will say though, that in India, where fascist Hindu nationalism is being used by government to harm minority communities, steal land and secure populist votes, Patel makes a distinction between revelatory and weaponised faith. Kid is raised in peace by his mother with the former, but as an adult he lives in a world where the latter has taken hold and is being used by those in power to shore up more of that power for themselves.

For me - as the descendant of parents, grandparents and great grandparents who lived through anti-Tamil pogroms led by Sinhalese chauvinists weaponising Buddhism as part of their fascism in Sri Lanka, who like the rest of us, is living in an election year for Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi in India, and who is also frustratingly, helplessly bearing witness as the state of Israel and it’s allies conflate Zionism with Judaism in defence of the genocide being waged against Palestinians - watching this action film make the distinction between revelatory and weaponised faith was profound.

Love

Patel makes it a point in this film to show how Kid's most nourishing relationships, the ones that sustain him - indeed the ones that literally save his life - are those that he has with women and with people who don’t conform to the gender binary. In doing this, we see what Kid is fighting tooth (quite literally) and nail for throughout the film. We see what is at stake - what we stand to lose - if perpetrators get to rule without accountability.

Its also no mistake that these relationships are all tied visually to the natural world in the film: Kid's mother's deep ties to the earth, rivers, trees and roots that she leads him through as a child. Alpha and the hijra's sanctuary, the Ardhanareeshvara temple with its most sacred space being the roots of a holy tree. Sita and her koel tattoo: the memory of the forest carried on her skin while she traverses the brutal reality of the city. Patel is making a point here too. About nourishment of another kind, through our connection with the earth instead of extraction from it. The visuals in the film drive this point home, particularly when contrasted with the industrialisation and poverty of the city.

Two particular loving relationships that stood out for me were the love shared between Kid and the hijra community as well as between him and his mother.

Alpha, hijra Elder and the hijra community

Keeper of the Ardhanareeshvara Temple and hijra Elder, Alpha becomes a mother-figure to Kid after he is rescued with near-fatal injuries. It is Alpha who keeps watch over him as he recovers, helps Kid to confront the totality of his past memories which his trauma has kept fragmented, and who ultimately leads a veritable hijra army to join forces with him to assassinate some fascists.

Alpha's gentleness with Kid was so moving to see, in particular during the conversation they have about his attempt as a child to save his mother from the fire set by her rapist and murderer. That exchange moved me to tears.

Kid: I failed her.

Alpha: No. You tried to save her. You see scars. I see the courage of a child fighting to save his mother.

The wider hijra community at the temple also take Kid in and care for him during his recovery. Truly, the scenes at the temple were some of my favourite in Monkey Man. Outside of his memories of his mother, they are the only scenes where we see love, peace and joy on the faces of any of the characters in this film.

Also witness this moment of delight below as the hijra at the temple appreciate a fine ass man channelling his righteous anger and fucking up a punching bag full of rice. I note that the music during this training montage is simply stunning. Ustad Zakir Hussain's rapid fire tablas punctuated by each of Patel's landed punches and kicks and then followed by Jed Kurzel's achingly soaring instrumentals (listen to "The Kid" from the movie's score) were just *chef’s kiss*.

Another favourite moment for me was when Kid decides to go back to the underground fight ring one last time and not throw his matches (as he had been doing prior). He bets on himself and when he inevitably wins his fights, he takes the money and gives it to the hijra, ensuring that they can continue to live at the temple without fear of being evicted. We love to see a man who literally pays his rent.

Neela, his mother

Kid’s first teacher and the center of his life as a child. In almost every memory we are shown of her, Kid remembers his mother walking through a forest, sharing her ecological and religious knowledge with him and in doing so, positioning him within the wider world.

GIF by dailyflicks

We watch as he takes this understanding with him forward through the remainder of the film. His conversation as an adult with Alphonso as they drive through the city in the latter's tuk tuk is emblematic of this. "They don't even see us", Kid says of the elite who frequent the club where he has just gained employment, "they're all up there living and we are stuck in this."

His mother showed him what it was to live: to be still and in concert with the world and the Divine around you, to be loved fiercely, and to thrive as a result. This is in stark contrast to what Kid has had to learn to do in the city: to survive, to merely exist. He is never depicted resting or at home as an adult. He's always working, hustling and planning for the next thing, his next step. When he loses his village, his land and his mother as a child, Kid also inevitably loses his sense of home. It’s no coincidence that the tracks “Home” and “Mother” on the movie’s score sound almost identical.

Later at the end of the film, we see Kid close his eyes, having done what he set out to do. The last thing he sees is his mother, smiling at him in the forest. Her face is the face of God he gazes at before he succumbs to his injuries. This devotion to his mother is not just that of a child to a parent. Its also deeply tied to his Hindu faith which calls on its followers to honour the Divine Mother, the supreme feminine energy, Aathi Parashakthi, in all her manifestations including in those who mother us.

The movie ends with Kid’s deep, revelatory faith - instilled in him by his mother - and with the death of the man who weaponised that faith for power and wealth. It left all of us in the cinema seated in stunned silence even as the credits began to roll.

To describe Monkey Man as simply a revenge film does it an absolute disservice. This is not revenge. It is defence borne out of deep love for community and righteous opposition to injustice. Seeing hijra warriors dressed as Kali, the goddess of destruction, dealing death blows against fascists while spinning in the most beautiful lenghas was exhilarating (I literally screamed “YESSSSSSS!” at the screen when they arrived). Seeing Sita take out pimp and sex trafficker Queenie got me cackling and yelling “whoooop!”. Seeing Kid, a masculine character act to defend women and people outside of the gender binary, from further systemic harm without any ulterior motive was absolutely unreal to witness on the big screen. Seeing a person of faith act in deep connection to that faith without judgment against anyone but those who perpetrate harm made me feel hopeful in a way that took me by surprise. Kid acted out of love and respect. I would argue that Sita, the hijra and Kid all acted out of recognition of a shared humanity.

And at a time when folks from marginalised communities are being subjected to horrendous violence worldwide, both interpersonal and systemic, watching the oppressed take their perpetrators out…and I mean out (see: a rapist and murderer getting bludgeoned to death with a glittery high heel and a fascist, self-proclaimed “holy man” being stabbed in his third eye by the blade he hid in his own “sacred” pathankal/paduka), well, it was cathartic to see.

Am I saying violence is the answer to systemic violence? I think the answer to that question is context-specific. Non-violent resistance has a place, but it’s by necessity a performance and requires an audience. What do you do when no one’s watching? What do you do when the people who are watching are doing nothing to stop your suffering? What then? These questions are what many liberals refuse to grapple with because the answers are too uncomfortable for their polite sensibilities. But if you keep your foot on someone's neck long enough, you should expect them to fight back, by any means necessary. In Monkey Man, we have an action film where we get to witness that resistance in all its visceral glory.

[hrhstarrydawnn]

Look for the signs…

Astro Insights

If you review your life over you have had people come and go. If each person is under a (zodiac) sign, then signs are all around us on an everyday basis. Want to find out what your life needs at a particular moment in time? Are you in need of a sign? Review who is the most dominant figure in your life at that moment. Take heed so you do not miss your sign. You are now on the receiving end-receiving mode.

An Aries comes into your life when you need to stand up for yourself. You could be lacking the courage to do so and an Aries will give you the motivation and inclination to begin to fight those battles. You need to have validation that you have permission to select this battle to fight. You will win if you take action!

A Taurus comes into your life when you must understand your worth. You do not know how valuable you are and that you deserve nice things too. You have validation that you have permission to receive gifts you are owed. It’s okay to be materialistic for once! After all, you earned it!

A Gemini enters your life when you need to communicate with someone. You may also need to get a lot off your chest. Gemini listens until you are done so you can just breathe afterward. You need some validation that you have permission to speak up. You deserve to be heard!

A Cancer enters your life when you are in need of some nurturing and caretaking. You have been selfless- doing it all for so many people. You have at times sacrificed your own needs. You need validation that you have permission to receive some affection. Come here baby…

A Leo enters your life when you are deserving of some much-needed affirmation. You will soon be rewarded for work you have done behind the scenes. Receive your well-earned recognition. You need validation to have permission to receive your public praise now! Congratulations!

A Virgo enters your life when you need a deep cleaning. They come to put everything all back together again, but after you purge the old and unnecessary. They will come clean up your life just with their energy alone. More than likely all the crumbs need to be vacuumed from your life. You need validation that you have permission to throw it all away. Basura!

A Libra comes into your life when you have been disempowered in a certain area of your life. Balance needs to be restored. If you allow Libra to assist you, you will tip the scales in your favor, somehow. You need validation that you can take the sword from Lady Justice. Now is the time...

A Scorpio comes into your life when a secret needs to be revealed. They will either tell you the secret or will be in your life when you receive the secret. Nothing will be hidden when they are around. You need validation that you deserve to know the truth. Don't shoot the messenger.

A Sagittarius comes into your life when you are uncertain where you are heading. What will the next step be? No need to worry about making the wrong decision. A Sag will tell you the next step and the final step- the origin, and the destination. You need validation that you can take some time to plan your next move. Vision Board party?

A Capricorn comes into your life when you need structure and discipline. Your foundation was built on sand. We need something sturdier and durable, something that could weather many storms. You have the validation that you can go in sequential order, brick by brick. Remember slow and steady wins the race!

An Aquarius comes into your life when your morality will be the focus. You will be able to define or redefine your belief system. When do you draw the line? Only you can answer that. You have the validation that you can set boundaries and create new boundaries if you want. You can say NO!

A Pisces comes into your life when you are in desperate need of a vacation, but cannot physically travel. You may have a lot on your plate at the current moment and have obligations that prevent you from traveling. You need validation that it's okay to take a mental health break. Mental Health Matters!

Next time you say you need a sign look at the dominant figures around you. This could come in the form of a friend, foe, stranger, acquaintance, co-worker, family, etc. Review their sun, moon, rising sign, degrees, and house. Then accept the gifts they organically offer to you without effort. The answer is right in front of you staring at you. What are you being told to continue your journey? What do you need to continue your journey? Do you see your sign?

Linguist Insights

If there are signs all around us? Who is currently around you? And what is their name? And what does it mean? For example: If someone you encounter is named Treasure and this name means "A collection of valuable things; accumulated wealth; a stock of money wealth...", (according to names.org) look to see if your finances have stabilized or increased since entering your life. A name carries a meaning and with that, it carries an energy. This is our inherent gift to the world.